Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/37543/2026 of ABHISHEK SARAN Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 17 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.37543 of 2026 Date of decision: 17.07.2026 Abhishek Saran …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present :- Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.37543 of 2026
Date of decision: 17.07.2026
Abhishek Saran
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present :-
Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. AG, Punjab,
for the respondent-State.
Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate and
Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate
for the complainant.
*****
H.S.GREWAL, J.(Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 439 Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 92 dated 13.08.2022, registered under Sections 419 IPC/319(2) BNS, 465 IPC/336(2) BNS, 468 IPC/336(3) BNS, 471 IPC/340(2) BNS, 120-B IPC/61(2) BNS at Police Station Mullanpur Garibdas, District S.A.S Nagar Mohali.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the FIR was registered on the complaint of Lt. Col. Pawan Kumar Saran, who had earlier lodged a police complaint and a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. It is alleged that, during the pendency of the proceedings, the accused continued to use two overaged vehicles (a Honda Activa and a Swift Dzire) in violation of NCR regulations. During the inquiry, it was further found that summons issued by the Court in maintenance proceedings were allegedly received and acknowledged by Balkar Singh, who impersonated the complainant, with the active involvement of Abhishek Saran, thereby the instant FIR has been registered.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused Balkar Singh has already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 10.04.2023 in CRM-M No14950 of 2023 (Annexure P-5). It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody for the last 01 month and 26 days. He, therefore, prays for release of the petitioner on regular bail.
4. Notice of motion.
5. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. AG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. He has filed the custody certificate of the petitioner which is taken on the record. As per the custody certificate, the petitioner is in custody for the last 01 month and 26 days.
6. Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on the record. He also opposed the grant of bail while submitting that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature.
7. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
8. In view of the above submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts that the petitioner is in custody for the last more than 01 month and 26 days and that the trial is likely to take a long time to conclude, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner during the pendency of the trial as the continuous detention of the petitioner would not serve the ends of justice.
9. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bonds, surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.
10. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner misuses the concession of bail, the State/complainant would be at liberty to seek cancellation of his bail.
(H.S.GREWAL) 17.07.2026
JUDGE seema Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No