Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8481/2026 of ARUNA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 17 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 CRWP-8481-2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 ARUNA AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Sukhdev S. Gopera, Advocate and Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 17.07.2026
ARUNA AND ANOTHER
... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
... RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:-
Mr. Sukhdev S. Gopera, Advocate and
Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No. 3 to 5 so that they may not become a victim of continuos oppression and violence inflicted upon them by the official respondents with a further prayer that respondents No. 3 to5 not to make harassment to the petitioner by calling them at the police station time and again.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondents No. 3 to 5, are repeatedly summoning the petitioners to the police station time and again without assigning any reason and without adopting the proepr procedure of law. He further submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Tarn Taran, Punjab in this regard; however, no action has been taken thereon. It is contended that the petitioners have a genuine apprehension of being falsely implicated and RENU RAWAT 2026.07.17 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh subjected to unnecessary harassment at the hands of the official respondents. Accordingly, it is prayed that appropriate protection be granted to the petitioners in accordance with law and that, in the event their presence is required for any enquiry or investigation, prior notice be served upon them.
3. Notice of motion to the official respondents.
4. Mr. P.S.Pandher, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of teh respondents and submits that investigation shall be carried out as per law.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents that, in case the presence of the petitioners are required for the purpose of any enquiry or investigation in the present case, they shall be served with a written notice at least three days in advance before requiring their appearance in accordance with law.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 17.07.2026
(H.S.GREWAL) renu
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.17 17.10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh