Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8495/2026 of LOVEPREET SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8495-2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 LOVEPREET SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Ms. Jigyasa Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-8495-2026

Date of Decision: 17.07.2026

LOVEPREET SINGH

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Ms. Jigyasa Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to official respondent No. 2 for deciding representation dated 06.07.2026 for protection of the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family due to the threat given by respondents No. 4 to 7.

2. On the oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner Senior Superintendent of Police be read as Superintendent of Police, District Fatehabad. Registry is directed to make the necessary corrections at the relevant places.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Fatehabad but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be RENU RAWAT 2026.07.17 16.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Fatehabad to look into his representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.

4. Notice of motion to official respondents No. 1 to 3.

5. At the asking of the Court,Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

7. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Fatehabad to consider and decide the representation representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.

(H.S.GREWAL) 17.07.2026

JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.17 16.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead