Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8489/2026 of RAJPAL AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 17 July 2026
111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Rajpal and State of Pu CORAM: HON'BLE Present: SHALINI 1 are in live- the official respondents to protect their life and lib to 7. 2. are major. 15.07.2006 petitioner No. 12.07.2026 4 to 7, who 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
I Rajpal and State of Pu CORAM: H
Present:
SHALINI
are in live- the official to 7.
2. are major. 15.07.2006 petitioner N 12.07.2026 4 to 7, who
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDI
another
Versus unjab and others
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI S Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Ad for the petitioners. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, P
**** SINGH NAGPAL, J. ( Oral ) Apprehending danger to their in relationship, have filed the pr l respondents to protect their life Learned counsel for the petiti As per their Aadhaar Cards, 6 and the date of birth of petitio No. 2 were forcing her to marry 6 and took shelter in the house o o are father, mother, brother and
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH
CRWP-8489-2 Date of decision : 17.07.2
…….Petitio
...….Respond SINGH NAGPAL dvocate, Punjab. life and liberty, the petitioners, w resent petition with a prayer to di e and liberty from respondents N ioners submits that both petitio date of birth of petitioner No. oner No.2 is 07.07.2006. Parent someone else. She left her home of petitioner No. 1. Respondent N d cousin brother of petitioner N
ners dents who irect No. 4 ners 1 is ts of e on Nos. No.2, NAROTAM DASS 2026.07.17 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CRWP-8489-2
were unhap petitioners. of their life
3.
4. the official
5.
6. the fact tha
7. petitioners, respondent a period of lives and li earliest, so
8. between th action, initi
9. July 17, 20 narotam
Wheth Wheth ppy with the relationship and we . Petitioners moved representatio e and liberty but to no avail. Notice of motion. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG P respondents. Heard. Life and liberty of petitioners at their relationship does not have Without commenting on th , the petition is disposed of ts to decide representation dated f one month. In case, it is found iberty of the petitioners, necessa as to ensure that no harm is caus However, this order shall he petitioners nor shall have an iated or to be initiated against th Disposed of accordingly.
her speaking/reasoned her reportable ere extending threats to eliminate on to respondent No.2 for protec Punjab, accepts notice on behal s has to be protected irrespectiv e approval of society. he validity of relationship of with a direction to the off d 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) wi d that there is a genuine threat to ary steps as per law be taken at sed to the petitioners. neither validate the live-in-st ny bearing on any civil or crim em. ( SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
e the ction lf of ve of the ficial ithin o the t the tatus minal L ) NAROTAM DASS 2026.07.17 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment