Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8509/2026 of MAHAK DEVI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 17 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Mahak Devi State of Haryana Date of Date of Date of Date of DDDDecision: ecision: ecision: ecision: Date of Uploading: Date
CRWP
CRWP
CRWP
CRWP-8509
IN T
IN T
IN T
IN T
Mahak Dev
State of Har
Date of
Date of
Date of
Date of Dec
ec
ec
ec
Date of Upl
Date of Upl
Date of Upl
Date of Upl
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present
Present
Present
Present:
SUMEET G
SUMEET G
SUMEET G
SUMEET G
Constitution
the official
private resp
2.
respondents
3.
Senior DAG
4.
against the
family mem
5.
relying upo
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB
CHANDIGAR
CHANDIGAR
CHANDIGAR
CHANDIGAR
CRWP
CRWP
CRWP
CRWP-8509
8509-20
vi and another
versus
ryana and others
cision:
cision:
cision:
cision: July 17
July 17, 202
, 202
, 202
, 2026
loading:
loading:
loading:
loading: July 17
July 17, 2026
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM
Mr. Nitin Katoria, Advocate fo
*****
GOEL
GOEL
GOEL
GOEL, J. (ORAL)
, J. (ORAL)
, J. (ORAL)
, J. (ORAL)
By way of present petition f
n of India, the petitioners are se
respondents to protect their lif
pondent Nos.4 to 7.
Notice of motion only to respo
s).
On the asking of the Court,
G Haryana accepts notice on beh
As per the petitioners, they
wishes of private respondent No
mbers/ relatives of petitioner No.1
Both the petitioners have cla
on their Aadhar Cards indicating
B AND HARYANA AT
B AND HARYANA AT
B AND HARYANA AT
B AND HARYANA AT
RH
RH
RH
RH
....Petitioners
....Respondents
MEET GOEL
MEET GOEL
MEET GOEL
MEET GOEL
or the petitioners.
filed under Article 226 of the
eking issuance of directions to
fe and liberty at the hands of
ondents Nos. 1 to 3 (i.e. official
Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur,
half of the official respondents.
have married on 15.07.2026
os.4 to 6, who happen to be the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. aimed themselves to be major g that date of birth of petitioner MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.17 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRWP CRWP CRWP CRWP-8509
8509-2026
No.1-Mahak Devi is 17.10.2006 and petitioner No.2-Deepak is 15.09.2004.
6. Without commenting on legality and validity of the marriage as also merits of the contentions raised in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.2 (Superintendent of Police, Hiar) to look into representation dated 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-7) stated to have been submitted by the petitioners & pass an appropriate order thereupon within two weeks from today.
7. Liberty is reserved in favour of the private respondents to seek recall of this order on showing sufficient cause.
8. However, if the petitioners are found to have been involved in any other case, then this order shall not preclude the competent authority from taking lawful action against the petitioners.
9. The petition stands disposed disposed disposed disposed of of of of.
10. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
July 17, 2026
mahavir
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.17 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment