Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8270/2026 of SWARANJEET KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (239) CRWP-8270-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-17.07.2026 SAWARANJEET KAUR … Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision:-17.07.2026

SAWARANJEET KAUR

… Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:

Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurpartap Singh, AAG Punjab

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J

. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present criminal writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for release of the detenue namely Chahatpreet Singh son of Achhara Singh from the illegal custody of respondent No.3 who has been picked up on 10.07.2026 and to produce him before this Court and further to appoint a warrant officer to get release the detenue from illegal custody of respondent No.3.

2. Report of the Warrant Officer has been received, which is taken on record.

3. As per the report, Warrant Officer visited the premises of CIA Staff, Khanna in the presence of the petitioner and her husband and found the alleged detenue, Chahatpreet Singh @ Prince, lodged in the lock-up. The detenue alleged that he had been illegally picked up from Mohali by ASI Parmod Kumar and his police party and subjected to physical assault while in police custody and pointed out certain visible POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document injuries on his body. The police officials, however, informed that the detenue had been legally arrested in FIR No.0174 dated 06.07.2026 under the Arms Act and the BNS and had been medically examined after arrest. The police denied the allegations of custodial torture and stated that the injuries were sustained during an attempt by the detenue to escape from custody. As per record of FIR and other papers, detenue- Chahatpreet Singh was legally apprehended by the police and no further action is required to be taken in this petition.

4. In view of this, the instant petition stands disposed of.

5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 17th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead