Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/6462/2026 of HANIF MOHAMMAD @ HONEY Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS on 16 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6462-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 HANIF MOHAMMAD @ HONEY ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-6462-2026
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026
HANIF MOHAMMAD @ HONEY
......... Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present :
Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of appropriate directions to the respondent-authorities not to harass, threaten, or falsely implicate the petitioner in any criminal proceedings arising out of the interview in question.
2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner confined the relief sought in the present petition to a direction for consideration of the representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-8).
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
5. Learned State counsel submits, on instructions, that the representation dated 21.05.2026 (Annexure P-8) has already been SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document decided. A copy of the order deciding the said representation has been produced before the Court today, which is taken on record.
6. In view of the aforesaid development, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, and the same is accordingly disposed of.
7. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 16.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document