Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/23594/2026 of VIVEK Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 16 July 2026
(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (204) CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 VIVEK … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh Thind, Advocate for
CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(204)
CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-16.07.2026
VIVEK
… Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Harkirat Singh Thind, Advocate
for Ms. Himani Anand, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J
. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 read with Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Sections of Cr.P.C. are 438 and 482) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.225 dated 20.07.2025 under Sections 115(2) [323 IPC], 190 [149 IPC], 191 (3) [148 IPC], 333 [452 IPC] and 351 (2) [506 IPC] of the BNS, 2023 [Sections 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of SC and ST Act, 2018 added later on and subsequently deleted on 12.03.2026 registered at Po- lice Station Saran, District Faridabad, Haryana.
2. This Court, vide order dated 01.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of their arrest, they were ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) 2
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 01.05.2026 passed by the Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation.
4. Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 01.05.2026 is made ab- solute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the condi- tions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16thJuly, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document