Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8420/2026 of SUKHWINDER SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 16 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 SUKHWINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Samay Sandhawalia, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution
IN TH
AT
SUKHWINDER
STATE OF PU
CORAM: HO
Present:
Mr
H.S. GREWAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Thi Constitution of enquire into the commission of petitioner is rece but the police a taking any actio any appropriate issuance of di (Annexure P-1).
2. Lea preferred a rep General of Polic taken so far. Le are issued to r
HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA T CHANDIGARH
CR Da R SINGH
VERSUS
UNJAB AND OTHERS ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.G . Samay Sandhawalia, Advocate
**** L, J. (ORAL) is petition has been filed u India seeking directions to offic representation (Annexure P-1) m offence being committed by eiving threats to his life at the h authorities despite having the kn on. The life of petitioner and his e action is not taken immediate rection to respondent No. 4 . arned counsel for the petitioner resentation (Annexure P-1) ce, Punjab Police Headquarters earned counsel submits that he respondent No.4- Director Gene
B AND HARYANA
RWP-8420-2026 te of Decision: 16.07.2026 .....PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS GREWAL e for the petitioner.
under Article 226/227 of the cial respondents No. 3 and 4 to made to the police regarding the some unknown persons. The hands of some unknown persons nowledge of the matter are not s family will remain in danger if ely. Prayer is being made for to decide the representation contends that the petitioner has to respondent No.4- Director (PPHQ) but no action has been would be satisfied if directions eral of Police, Punjab Police e o e e s t f r n s r n s POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.17 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8420-20
Headquarters (P District Sri Muk steps at the earli
3. Not
4. At accepts notice on
5. I ha
6. Kee limited prayer m direction to re Headquarters (P District Sri Muk P-1) of the pet from the date of order.
July 16, 2026 poonam
Wh
Wh
PPHQ) or to respondent No.3-S ktsar Sahib to look into his repr iest. tice of motion to the respondents the asking of the Court, Mr. n behalf of the respondents. ave heard learned counsel for the eping in view the facts and circ made by the petitioner, the prese spondent No.4- Director Gen PPHQ) and respondent No.3-Se ktsar Sahib to consider and decid titioner in accordance with law f receipt of certified copy of thi
hether speaking/ reasoned : hether Reportable :
Senior Superintendent of Police, resentation and take appropriate s. .P.S.Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab e parties. cumstances of the case and the ent petition is disposed of with a eral of Police, Punjab Police enior Superintendent of Police, de the representation (Annexure w within a period of four weeks is order and pass an appropriate (H.S.GREWAL)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No , e b e a e , e s e
POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.17 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document