Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/38375/2026 of ROHTAS KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CRM-M-38375-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 ROHTAS KUMAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr.Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-38375-2026

Date of Decision: 16.07.2026

ROHTAS KUMAR

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

....RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:-

Mr.Gaurav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 482 Cr.P.C.) seeking transfer of investigation in FIR No.110 dated 16.05.2026 registered under Sections 115, 190, 191(3) and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 (Corresponding to Sections 323, 148, 149, 506 of the IPC, 1860) at Police Station Kaithal Sadar, District Kaithal, to some senior police officer, with a direction for fresh, fair, impartial and time-bound investigation.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the local police is in collusion with the accused persons.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the investigation is near completion and that the final report shall be presented before the Court shortly.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, no further POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.17 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-38375-2026

order is required to be passed at this stage. However, the State is directed to file the final report within a period of six weeks.

7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to contest the same, if so advised.

8. Petition stands disposed of.

(H.S.GREWAL) July 16, 2026

JUDGE poonam

Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No

Whether Reportable :

Yes/No

POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.17 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead