Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8474/2026 of HEENA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
1 168 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8474-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 HEENA AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Ms. Pragti Kumari, Advocate for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8474-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026
HEENA AND ANOTHER
......... Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present :
Ms. Pragti Kumari, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG Punjab.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and have performed marriage on 12.07.2026. Copy of marriage certificate is (Annexure P-5). Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-7) was also made to respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, District Jalandhar for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, District Jalandhar, to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents.
4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of official respondents. POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, District Jalandhar to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 16.07.2026 poonam Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document