Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/14324/2026 of SUKHDEV SINGH ALIAS SONU AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (288) CRM-M-14324-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 SUKHDEV SINGH @ SONU AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioners. Ms.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(288)
CRM-M-14324-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-16.07.2026
SUKHDEV SINGH @ SONU AND ANOTHER
… Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
None for the petitioners.
Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG Punjab.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J
. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None is present on behalf of the petitioners. As per order dated 08.04.2026, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to amend the petition by mentioning Section 201 of IPC. Thereafter, they sought another adjournment but the order was not complied with. Today none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the petition.
2. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant petition on the docket, indefinitely.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document