Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/2376/2026 of RUKHSAR AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2376-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 RUKHSAR AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Abdul Aziz, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Kuljinder

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CRWP-2376-2026

Date of Decision: 16.07.2026

RUKHSAR AND OTHERS

... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Abdul Aziz, Advocate

for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Kuljinder Dhindsa, AAG, Punjab.

****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)

The opinion of the Medical Board of PGIMER reads as under:- “The Medical Board conducted clinic-radiological examination of Mohd. Ilyas s/o Mohd. Ramjan, Vishal@

Vicky s/o Bittu and Mohd. Sahil @Kalu s/o Mohd. Sakeel.

X-ray imaging was reviewed in consultation Dr. Tarvinder Singh, Department of Radio diagnosis.

Final Medical Opinion and Findings

The Medical Board has arrived at the following conclusions

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. 1. Mohd. Sahil Kallu:- Right ankle fracture (involving both the medial malleolus and lateral malleolus)- Grievous injury

2. 2. Mohd. Ilyas:- Fracture of the fibula in the right leg-Grievous injury

3. 3. Vishal @ Vicky- No evidence of any fracture- No grievous injury.” VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.17 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-2376-2026

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. A copy of the report be handed over to the counsel for the petitioner but the original be retained on the file. Needless to say, the petitioners are at liberty to apply for and receive yet another original copy of the report of the Medical Board from PGIMER within a period of 01 week from the next date of their application. Disposed of.

(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE July 16, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.07.17 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead