Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8409/2026 of KOEL AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
1 173 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8409-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2025 KOEL AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8409-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 16.07.2025
KOEL AND ANOTHER
...Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:
Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG Punjab.
*****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No.1 to 3, to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 10 and other family members and associates of petitioner No.1, and to decide the representation dated 10.07.2026 moved by the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in live-in-relationship and are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 10.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) was also made to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, District Pathankot, Punjab, for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel POONAM 2026.07.16 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, District Pathankot, Punjab to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest and to consider and decide the representation dated 10.07.2026 moved by the petitioners.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot, District Pathankot, Punjab to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents and to consider and decide the representation dated 10.07.2026 moved by the petitioners.
6. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16.07.2026 JUDGE poonam Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No POONAM 2026.07.16 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document