Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/8364/2026 of CHHAYA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8364-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 CHHAYA AND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-8364-2026

Date of Decision: 16.07.2026

CHHAYA AND ANOTHER

......... Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

..... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present :

Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavata, DAG, Haryana.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL

, J. (Oral)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS (corresponding to Section 482 of Cr.P.C.) seeking issuance of directions to official respondents No.2 and 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 and 5 and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and have performed marriage on 09.07.2026. Copy of marriage certificate is (Annexure P-3). Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 10.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) was also made to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Hisar, Haryana, for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Hisar, Haryana, to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.

3. Notice of motion to official respondents.

4. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavata, learned DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.

5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Hisar, Haryana, to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 16.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead