Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/10302/2026 of SEEMA SHARMA AND ANR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR on 16 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 355 CRM-M-10302-2026 SEEMA SHARMA AND ANR .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR .....RESPONDENTS DATE OF DECISION: 16.07.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 16.07.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Prabhjot Singh, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 355
CRM-M-10302-2026
SEEMA SHARMA AND ANR .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR .....RESPONDENTS DATE OF DECISION: 16.07.2026 DATE OF UPLOADING: 16.07.2026
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. Prabhjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Panwar, Additional AG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Redhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. ….. SUMEET GOEL
, J (ORAL)
The substantive prayer made in the petition reads as follows - “It is, therefore, most respectully prayed the present petition may kindly be allowed and FIR No.69 dated 9.2.2018 (Annexure P-1) Under sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC of 1860, Faridabad Kotwali, Faridabad, as well of District of of Full Bench as all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on account settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2 /complainant by way issuing No Due Certificate on 14.8.2019 (Annexure P-2) effected between the parties, with mutual consent in view judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in case titled as "Kulwinder Singh & ors Vs. State of Punjab & anr." 2007
(4) Criminal Court Cases 153, may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.” Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that there is no valid compromise qua the FIR in question. In view thereof, the petition in hand is dismissed.
(SUMEET GOEL) 16.07.2026
JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2026.07.16 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document