Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8395/2026 of LOVEDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 LOVEDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Manish Bhoria, **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This Constitution of India for directing the respondents No. 2 and lives and liberty of the petitioners
IN
LOVEDEEP SI
STATE OF PU
CORAM: HO
Present:
Mr
***
H.S. GREWAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Thi Constitution of lives and liberty to interfere in t respondents No. interfere with th manner.
2. Lea petitioners being Ever since then, the private re (Annexure P-5) Police, District alleged threat p respondents
N THE HIGH COURT OF PUN
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8
Date of D INGH AND ANOTHER VERSUS UNJAB AND OTHERS ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.G . Manish Bhoria, Advocate for t ** L, J. (ORAL) is Criminal Writ Petition has bee India for directing the respond y of the petitioners and also direc the personal lives and liberty o .2 and 3 not to allow responden he liberty and lives of the petit arned counsel for the petitio g major, got married against the , the petitioners are being threat spondents. Resultantly, a rep was also made to respondent N Sri Muktsar Sahib wherein a m perception. Learned counsel su
NJAB AND HARYANA
8395-2026 Decision: 16.07.2026 .....PETITIONERS ....RESPONDENTS GREWAL the petitioners. en filed under Article 226 of the ents No. 2 and 3 to protect the cting respondents No. 4 to 6 not of the petitioners and directing nts No. 4 to 6 or anybody else to tioners or to harass them in any oners submits that both the e wishes of private respondents. tened with dire consequences by presentation dated 13.07.2026 No.2- Senior Superintendent of mention has been made about the ubmits that despite the official e e t g o y e . y f e l POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.16 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8395-20
having been com been taken to c that he would b Superintendent representation d the earliest.
3. Not
4. At accepts notice on
5. Kee “Lata Singh V. petition is disp Superintendent representation d accordance with the petitioners a
6. It i Court about the validity of the m
July 16, 2026 poonam
Wh
Wh mmunicated about the alleged t come to the rescue of the petitio be satisfied if directions are issu of Police, District Sri Mukt dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-5 tice of motion to respondents No the asking of the Court, Mr. P n behalf of respondents No. 1 to eping in view the mandate of . State of U.P. and another”, J posed of with a direction t of Police, District Sri Muk dated 13.07.2026 (Annexure P-5 h law to ensure that no harm is t the hands of private respondent s clarified that this order shall n e marriage of the parties and marriage has been expressed in th
hether speaking/reasoned : hether reportable
: threat perception, no steps have oners. Learned counsel submits ued to respondent No.2- Senior tsar Sahib to look into their
5) and take appropriate steps at
o. 1 to 3 only. P.S.Pandher, Asstt. A.G. Punjab
3. Supreme Court in the case of JT 2006 (6) SC 173, the present to respondent No.2- Senior ktsar Sahib to look into the
5) and take appropriate action in caused to the life and liberty of ts. not be treated as a stamp of this no opinion with regard to the his order.
(H.S.GREWAL)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No e s r r t b f t r e n f s e POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.16 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document