Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8416/2026 of SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CRWP-8416-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ****
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8416-2026
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026
SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER
...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondent No.4 not to harass or interfere in the life of the petitioners as the petitioners are known to each other from a long time and had done nothing wrong but are facing threats from respondent No.4.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 has been in a live in relationship with petitioner No.2. The private respondents have been extending threats of dire consequences to the petitioners as they are averse to their live in relationship. While drawing the attention of this Court to representation dated 11.07.2026 (Annexure P-1), learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla seeking police help but in vain. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla to look into the aforesaid representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.16 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8416-2026
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. P.S.Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.
5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting upon the status of live in relationship of the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla to look into the aforesaid representation qua the alleged threat perception and take necessary steps, as may be required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that there is no adjudication on merits and this is not a blanket order of protection from arrest in any FIR. It is further made clear that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioners is required in any cognizable case.
(H.S.GREWAL) July 16, 2026
JUDGE poonam
Whether speaking/ reasoned :
Yes/No
Whether Reportable :
Yes/No
POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.16 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document