Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/33847/2026 of SURAJ Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 16 July 2026
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 SURAJ .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Custody certificate has been
233
CRM-M-33847-2026
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026
SURAJ
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
....RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Rishi Pal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Custody certificate has been filed by learned State counsel in the Court today and the same is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
3. Permitted to do so.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
(H.S.GREWAL) 16.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.17 16.09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh