Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/38305/2026 of AJAIB SINGH TOOR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38305-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 AJAIB SINGH TOOR ......... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Vishal Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner (Through
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38305-2026
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026
AJAIB SINGH TOOR
......... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present :
Mr. Vishal Nehra, Advocate
for the petitioner (Through V.C.)
Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS/Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for issuance directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to register an FIR against the private respondents as per representation dated 06.05.2026 and further issuance directions to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-
4) in accordance with law.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to the respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS, Nagar, to consider and decide representation dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that needful would be done in due course.
5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS, Nagar to decide the aforesaid representation dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required.
6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law.
7. Petition stands disposed of.
8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 16.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.16 18:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document