Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/15612/2026 of SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 16 July 2026
1- 135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15612-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 SUNIL KUMAR …PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-15612-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 16.07.2026
SUNIL KUMAR
…PETITIONER
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
…RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab.
****
SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petition under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeks a direction to respondents to conduct fair and impartial inquiry in complaint dated 22.02.2026 and take necessary action, in accordance with law.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 21.02.2026, private respondents trespassed into his house, physically assaulted his mother and caused her injuries. The incident was captured in the CCTV footage. Petitioner’s family was publicly humiliated through caste based abuses. A complaint was made to the official respondents but no action was taken.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that petitioner’s representation dated 22.02.2026 was received in the police station. Numerous times, petitioner was called but he failed to appear before the SUMIT SINGLA 2026.07.16 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document concerned police officer, whereupon the representation was consigned.
5. Against this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had repeatedly been visiting the police station and was in constant touch with the police of Police Post, Jagatpuri, Ludhiana, yet his representation was illegally consigned. He prays that the petition be considered as his representation and the official respondents be directed to take appropriate action.
6. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to again decide representation dated 22.02.2026 (Annexure P2), in accordance with law, within a period of 1 month and take necessary action, if so required. Petitioner shall join the inquiry as and when required.
7. The petition stands disposed of.
8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 16.07.2026 Sumit Singla Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SUMIT SINGLA 2026.07.16 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document