Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8277/2026 of RONAK AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS on 15 July 2026
108 Ronak and another State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh 1. been filed for the petitioner 2. were engaged in property Sampla-Beri Road, Sampla. Since 14.06.2025 extortion and threat crores. The matter was repo 16.06.2025 was receiving threat
CRWP-8277
Ronak and a
State of Har
CORAM: H
Present:
Shalini Sing
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. been filed fo the petitioner
2. were engage Sampla-Beri extortion and crores. The 16.06.2025 w receiving thr May 2026. had stopped was requeste and liberty however, no 7-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA
another
VERSUS ryana and others
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate fo Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Har
*** gh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Article 226 or directing official respondents rs and their family members. Learned counsel for the petiti ed in property dealing in Baba Road, Sampla. Since 14.06.2 d threat calls from one Himan matter was reported to the p was registered. Thereafter also, p reat calls from unknown number Due to fear, young school goin going to school and elderly pa ed vide Annexure P-2 to provide of the petitioners and their f action was taken.
F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRWP-8277-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026
Petitioners
Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL or the petitioner (through V.C). ryana. of the Constitution of India has to protect the life and liberty of ioners submits that petitioners a Mastnath Nagar, Rohtak and 2025, they had been receiving shu Bhau who demanded Rs.2 police and FIR No.223 dated petitioners have been repeatedly rs. The last call was received in ng children of petitioners family arents had fallen ill. The police e security and take action as life family members was at stake, )
s s
s f s d g d y n y e e , KAPIL 2026.07.15 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8277
3.
4. of official re namely Sanja been issued. father of the further subm the petitioner
5. disposed of w Police, Dist (Annexure P today, by pas threat percep
6. 15.07.2026 Kapil 7-2026 (O&M) Notice to the official respondent Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Ha espondents-State. He submits t ay Bhau was residing abroad an The last threat call was received e petitioner was provided licens mits that it was the duty of the St rs and security would be provide In view of the response of St with a direction to respondent N trict Rohtak, to decide rep P-2) submitted by the petitioner w ssing a reasoned and speaking o ption and take prompt and approp Pending applications, if any, stan Whether Speaking/Reason Whether Reportable :
ts. aryana, accepts notice on behalf that accused named in the FIR nd a look out notice has already d in September, 2025, whereafter sed gun to protect himself. He tate to protect life and liberty of ed in case threat is perceived. tate of Haryana, the petition is No. 3- Senior Superintendent of presentation dated 19.05.2026 within a period of 15 days from order. The police shall assess the priate action as per law. nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE oned :
Yes/No
Yes/No f R y r e f s f m e
) KAPIL 2026.07.15 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document