Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/32988/2026 of RANVEER SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 304 Ranveer Singh State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL 1. FIR No.162 BNS, 2023, Police Station Baragudha Section 25 of Arms Act and investigation. 2. order was passed: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT

IN THE

Ranveer Sin

State of Har

CORAM: H

Present:

SHALINI SI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. FIR No.162 BNS, 2023, Section 25 o investigation

2. order was pa E PUNJAB AND HARYANA H CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-329 Date of deci

ngh

V/S ryana

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DA Mr. Satbir Singh Gill, Advocate **** INGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks anticipatory ba dated 14.11.2025, under Sectio Police Station Baragudha, Distr f Arms Act and Section 61(2) o

n. This is the first petition for ant While issuing notice of motion ssed:- “ Learned counsel for th argued that although an offenc BNS has been invoked in the F is no injury caused to anyon question; that pistol shot has al the petitioner; that the petit

HIGH COURT AT 988-2026 (O&M) ision: 15.07.2026

…Petitioner

…Respondent LINI SINGH NAGPAL petitioner. G, Haryana.

e for the complainant.

ail in case arising out of ons 109(1) and 111(2) of rict Sirsa. Offences under f BNS were added during ticipatory bail. on 05.06.2026, following he petitioner has inter alia nce under Section 109 of FIR in question, yet, there ne in the occurrence in also not been attributed to itioner has been falsely KAPIL

CRM-M-32988 p -2026 (O&M) implicated in the FIR in que statement of his co-accused Lo allegedly implicated on the dis accused Rambaksh; that 4 accu have already been arrested; tha the occurrence in question has a the co-accused Rambaksh and any incriminating article has petitioner; that the petitioner i District Mansa in Punjab investigation and further to investigating agency on all mate Notice of motion. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Add notice on behalf of the State o time to file a status report. At 15.07.2026 for the said purpose. However, without com merits of the FIR/matter in que arguments of the learned couns the totality of the facts/circumst the petitioner is directed to jo concerned investigating officer today. It is also ordered that in the FIR in question, he shall be to the satisfaction of such office he shall comply with the term/s in Section 480(3) and 482(2 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.”

estion on the disclosure Lovepreet Singh who was isclosure statement of the used of the present matter at pistol allegedly used in already been recovered by d therefore no recovery of to be effected from the is permanent resident of and is ready to join to cooperate with the erial counts. ddl.A.G., Haryana, accepts of Haryana and prays for his request, adjourned to e. mmenting anything upon estion but considering the nsel for the petitioner and tances of the present case, oin investigation with the r within seven days from n the event of his arrest in be released on interim bail er. However, on such bail, and condition/s contained

2) of Bharatiya Nagarik

KAPIL

CRM-M-32988

3. Vid petitioner w investigation

4. Superintende learned State petitioner ha investigation

5. behalf of the today, which

6. this Court da without comm 05.06.2026, made absolu of Bharatiya

15.07.2026 Kapil

-2026 (O&M) de order dated 05.06.2026 pa was granted interim bail and n. Status report by way of ent of Police Sadar Sirsa, Distric e counsel, which is taken on as joined investigation and is no n. Mr. Satbir Singh Gill, Advocate e complainant and filed his pow h is taken on record. Petitioner has joined investigat ated 05.06.2026. In the circum menting on merits, the petition i granting interim anticipatory b ute, subject to the conditions laid Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS (SHAL

Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable assed by this Court, the d was directed to join affidavit of Deputy ct Sirsa has been filed by record. He submits that ot required for any further e has put in appearance on wer of attorney in Court tion pursuant to order of mstances of the case but is allowed and order dated bail to the petitioner, is d down in Section 482(2) S), 2023. LINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE d : Yes/No : Yes/No

KAPIL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead