CRM-M/20093/2026 of SAJAN SINGH @ KALI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 15 July 2026

1. FIR No.271 Narcotic Dru Chheharta, D bail.

2. p E PUNJAB AND HARYANA H CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-200 Date of deci

h

V/S njab

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punj

**** INGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks anticipatory ba dated 28.12.2025, under Sectio ugs and Psychotropic Substances District Amritsar. This is the firs On 30.04.2026, following order “ Present petition has anticipatory bail to the petitio dated 28.12.2025 under Section Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrop registered at Police Station Chhe It has been submitted by petitioner that the petitioner ha

HIGH COURT AT 093-2026 (O&M) ision: 15.07.2026

…Petitioner

…Respondent LINI SINGH NAGPAL the petitioner. jab.

ail in case arising out of ons 21, 27-A, 29/61/85 of s Act, 1985, Police Station st petition for anticipatory was passed:- been filed for grant of oner in case FIR No.271 ons 21, 27-A, 29/61/85 of pic Substances Act, 1985, heharta, District Amritsar. y learned counsel for the as been falsely implicated KAPIL

CRM-M-20093 p p -2026 (O&M) in this case. He submits that ne FIR nor there is any recovery m on account of the disclosure stat from whom recovery of 54 g effected, he has been roped submits that even otherwise th grams of heroin falls under commercial quantity. He submit there is no admissible evidence thus, submits that no prima against the petitioner and he de concession of anticipatory bail. Status report by way of af Singh, PPS, Assistant Com (Detective), Amritsar has be respondent-State in the Court record. Adjourned to 15.07.2026. In the meantime, in th petitioner shall be released on i satisfaction of the Arresting/In petitioner shall join investigatio Agency/Officer. He shall ab conditions as envisaged under S Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

(i) That the petitioner sha for interrogation by a po required.

(ii) That the petitioner sha make any inducement, t

neither he is named in the made from him. However, atement of the co-accused, grams of the heroin was in the present case. He he alleged recovery of 54 r the category of non- its that in the present case e against the petitioner. He facie case is made out deserves to be granted the affidavit of Mr. Harminder ommissioner of Police, een filed on behalf of today, same is taken on

6. he event of arrest, the interim bail subject to the nvestigating Officer. The on before the Investigating abide by the following Section 482(2) of Bhartiya 3:- all make himself available olice officer as and when all not directly or indirectly threat or promise to any

KAPIL

CRM-M-20093

3. Vid petitioner w investigation

4. Officer-ASI investigation

5. this Court da without comm 30.04.2026, made absolu of Bharatiya

15.07.2026 Kapil

-2026 (O&M) person acquainted with the dissuade him from disclos or to any police officer.

(iii) That the petitioner sha prior permission of the cou

de order dated 30.04.2026 pa was granted interim bail and n. Learned State counsel, on instru Pargat Singh submits that n and is not required for any furth Petitioner has joined investigat ated 30.04.2026. In the circum menting on merits, the petition i granting interim anticipatory b ute, subject to the conditions laid Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS (SHAL

Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable

he facts of the case so as to sing such facts to the court hall not leave India without urt.” assed by this Court, the d was directed to join uctions from Investigating petitioner has joined her investigation. tion pursuant to order of mstances of the case but is allowed and order dated bail to the petitioner, is d down in Section 482(2) S), 2023. LINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE d : Yes/No : Yes/No

KAPIL