Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/32820/2026 of NIRMALDAS SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 15 July 2026
AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 206 Nirmaldas Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL 1. FIR No.69 dated Station Nihal Singh Wala, District Moga. Offence under Section 29 of NDPS was added in the petition for anticipatory 2. order was
IN THE
Nirmaldas S
State of Pun
CORAM: H
Present:
SHALINI SI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. FIR No.69 d Station Nihal NDPS was a petition for a
2. order was pa E PUNJAB AND HARYANA H CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-328 Date of deci
Singh
V/S njab
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Rakesh, Advocate and Mr. Akashdeep, Advocate for th Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punj
**** INGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks anticipatory ba dated 25.04.2026, under Section l Singh Wala, District Moga. Of added in the FIR during invest anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion ssed:- “ Learned counsel for the argued that on 25.04.2026, in station in question, co-accused Dharma and Pargat Singh of the conscious possession of 50 gra of the provisions of the NDPS A
HIGH COURT AT 820-2026 (O&M) ision: 15.07.2026
…Petitioner
…Respondent LINI SINGH NAGPAL he petitioner. jab.
ail in case arising out of n 21 of NDPS Act, Police ffence under Section 29 of tigation. This is the first on 04.06.2026, following he petitioner has inter alia n the area of the police d Dharampreet Singh @ he petitioner were found in ams of heroin in violation Act; that on their arrest in KAPIL
CRM-M-32820-2026 (O&M) the matter in question, they are disclosure statement that the pe the alleged contraband to them; sold the same to them and ha them as well as the police in t disclosure statement of co-ac custody is always a weak type o for recording the conviction at stands registered against the pet is a B.A. Final year student an and that the petitioner is resid Punjab and is ready to join concerned Investigating Officer. Notice of motion. Ms. Samdisha Kaur, AAG on behalf of the State of Punjab status report. At her request, adj the said purpose. However, without com merits of the FIR/matter in que arguments of the learned couns the totality of the facts/circumst the petitioner is directed to j case/FIR in question with the officer within seven days from that in the event of his arrest in shall be released on interim b such officer. However, on such b the term/s and condition/s con
e alleged to have made a etitioner, in fact, had sold m; that the petitioner never as been falsely named by the case in question; that accused made in police of evidence not sufficient atleast; that no other case titioner; that the petitioner and has clear antecedents; dent of District Moga in n investigation with the r. AG, Punjab, accepts notice ab and seeks time to file a djourned to 15.07.2026 for mmenting anything upon estion but considering the nsel for the petitioner and tances of the present case, join investigation of the e concerned investigating m today. It is also ordered in the FIR in question, he bail to the satisfaction of bail, he shall comply with ntained in Section 480(3)
KAPIL
CRM-M-32820
3. Vid petitioner w investigation
4. Officer-ASI investigation
5. this Court da without comm 04.06.2026, made absolu of Bharatiya
15.07.2026 Kapil
-2026 (O&M) and 482(2) of Bharatiya Nag 2023.”
de order dated 04.06.2026 pa was granted interim bail and n. Learned State counsel, on instru Harwinder Singh submits th n and is not required for any furth Petitioner has joined investigat ated 04.06.2026. In the circum menting on merits, the petition i granting interim anticipatory b ute, subject to the conditions laid Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS (SHAL
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
agarik Suraksha Sanhita, assed by this Court, the d was directed to join uctions from Investigating hat petitioner has joined her investigation. tion pursuant to order of mstances of the case but is allowed and order dated bail to the petitioner, is d down in Section 482(2) S), 2023. LINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE d : Yes/No : Yes/No
KAPIL