Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/38059/2026 of BHUPENDER BANSAL Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 15 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38059-2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 BHUPENDER BANSAL .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38059-2026
Date of Decision: 15.07.2026
BHUPENDER BANSAL
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS read as Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking directions to official respondents No. 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 22.04.2026 and the subsequent representation (Annexure P-5 and P-6) in light of the inquiry report dated 07.07.2025, the cancellation report No. 409 dated 04.02.2026 and the order dated 09.03.2026 passed by ld. Area Magistrate accepting the cancellation report and thereafter take appropriate legal action including initiation of proceedings under Section 217 of BNS (corresponding Section 182 of Cr.P.C) against respondent No.5 for giving false information to respondent No. 3 and 4 and all other persons found involved with a further prayer to direct respondents No. 3 and 4 to submit a report to the ld. Court below to take strict legal action against respondent No.5. RENU RAWAT 2026.07.16 11.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri to look into his representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents No. 1 to 4.
4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri to consider and decide the representation dated 15.06.2026 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.
(H.S.GREWAL) 15.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.16 11.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh