Punjab and Haryana High Court
CWP/1473/2024 of RINKU AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 15 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWP-1473-2024 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 Rinku and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Ms. Jhuma Rani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: 15.07.2026
Rinku and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present:
Ms. Jhuma Rani Singha, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Sourabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Padam Kant Dwivedi, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
*****
DEEPAK SIBAL
, J (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP-19495-2015 – Foot Path Worker Swarojgar Bachao Sangharsh Samiti Panchkula Vs. State of Haryana was a similar matter in which through order dated 23.07.2025, directions have been issued by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court to the State as well as to the Municipal Corporation, Panchkula (for short hereinafter referred to as ‘MC Panchkula’) to ensure that a Committee, in terms of notification dated 08.10.2020 issued under Section 20 of the Street Vendor (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (hereinafter referred as as the ‘Act of 2014’), is constituted within eight weeks from the date of passing of such DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.21 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh order so that persons like the petitioners who were aggrieved with regard to allotment of vending sights, could approach such Committee for relief.
2. We have been informed that in terms of the afore directions, through office order dated 07.05.2026, MC, Panchkula has constituted the said Committee.
3. In the light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she be permitted to withdraw this petition to raise the grievance(s) taken up through this petition before the afore referred Committee.
4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
5. If the grievance, the liberty for which has been sought and got through this order is raised by the petitioner before the Committee, constituted as above, within one month from today, such grievance shall be considered and decided by the Committee within one month through passing of a speaking order and after granting opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners/their authorized representatives. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 15.07.2026 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2026.07.21 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh