Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/37988/2026 of RAJ KUMAR TAYAL Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37988-2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 RAJ KUMAR TAYAL .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate and Mr. Sourav Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-37988-2026

Date of Decision: 15.07.2026

RAJ KUMAR TAYAL

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate and

Mr. Sourav Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS read as Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking directions to the respondent for conducting a proper and fair investigation in the FIR No. 123 dated 18.03.2026 under Sections 115,3(5), 324 (4), 333,351(2) of BNS, 2023 (under Sections 323,427,452,506,34 of IPC) registered at Police Station City Palwal, District Palwal, Haryana against the accused persons and further to proceed in the matter by arresting the other accused persons and submit the challan in a time bound manner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-3) to Superintendent of Police, Palwal, Haryana but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are RENU RAWAT 2026.07.15 18.13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh issued to Superintendent of Police, Palwal, Haryana to look into his representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.

3. Notice of motion to the respondent.

4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Palwal, Haryana to consider and decide the representation dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.

(H.S.GREWAL) 15.07.2026

JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.15 18.13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead