Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8283/2026 of KAJAL AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 15 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CRWP-8283-2026 Date of Decision: 15.07.2026 KAJAL AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Manish Bhoria, Advocate for the petitioners. **** H.S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8283-2026
Date of Decision: 15.07.2026
KAJAL AND ANOTHER
.....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Manish Bhoria, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No. 4 to 7 not to interfere in the personal lives and liberty of the petitioners and directing respondents No.1 to 3 not to allow respondents No. 4 to 7 or anybody else to interfere with the liberty and lives of the petitioners or to harass them in any manner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners being major, got married against the wishes of private respondents. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) was also made to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Hansi wherein a mention has been made about the alleged threat perception. Learned counsel submits that despite the official respondents having POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.15 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8283-2026
been communicated about the alleged threat perception, no steps have been taken to come to the rescue of the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Hansi to look into their representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to respondents No. 1 to 3 only.
4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.
5. Keeping in view the mandate of Supreme Court in the case of “Lata Singh V. State of U.P. and another”, JT 2006 (6) SC 173, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Hansi to look into the representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate action in accordance with law to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.
6. It is clarified that this order shall not be treated as a stamp of this Court about the marriage of the parties and no opinion with regard to the validity of the marriage has been expressed in this order.
(H.S.GREWAL) July 15, 2026
JUDGE poonam
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
POONAM RATHORE 2026.07.15 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document