CRM-M/7451/2026 of GAURAV RAGHAV Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 15 July 2026

1. FIR No.05 d Station Secto petition for a

2. order was pa E PUNJAB AND HARYANA H CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-745 Date of deci

ghav

V/S ryana

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advoca Mr. Kshitij Bharti, AAG, Harya

**** INGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks anticipatory ba dated 07.01.2026, under Section or 7, IMT Manesar, Gurugram, anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion ssed:- “The instant petition und 2023 (438 of Cr.P.C.), has b anticipatory bail to the petitione 07.01.2026, registered under S 2023, at Police Station Sec Gurugram, Haryana. Learned counsel for the the dispute between the parties

HIGH COURT AT 51-2026 (O&M) ision: 15.07.2026

…Petitioner

…Respondent LINI SINGH NAGPAL ate for the petitioner. na.

ail in case arising out of n 316(2) of BNS, Police Haryana. This is the first on 09.02.2026, following der Section 482 of BNSS, been filed for grant of er in case FIR No.05 dated Section 316(2) of BNS, ector 7, IMT Manesar, petitioner contended that s is purely of a monetary KAPIL

CRM-M-7451-2 p p p p p p j 2026 (O&M) nature, arising out of the petition pumps and DG sets to the co contended that the petitioner ha in excess of the full and final s on 23.01.2026, i.e. after regi reflected in the account state against the remaining amount alleged offence is under Secti pertaining to criminal breach of Magistrate. It is also contended involved in any other crimin prayer has been made for grant petitioner. Notice of motion. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, pursuance of advance notice, respondent-State and submitted if bail is granted to petitioner in deposited by the petitioner as money dispute. Heard. Keeping in view the con counsel for the petitioner that parties is purely of a monetary has already paid the amount, th join investigation as and w Investigating Officer. In the eve be released on interim bail bail/surety bonds to Arresting/Investigating Officer

oner’s obligation to supply complainant. It is further as already paid an amount settlement, Rs. 3,50,000/-, istration of the FIR, as tement placed on record t of Rs. 2,88,000/-. The tion 316(2) of the BNS, of trust, and is triable by a d that the petitioner is not nal case. Accordingly, a t of anticipatory bail to the Sr. DAG, Haryana, in e, appears on behalf of d that he has no objection n case the money has been the matter pertains to a ntention raised by learned t the dispute between the nature, and the petitioner he petitioner is directed to when required by the ent of arrest, the petitioner on furnishing personal the satisfaction of r till the next date of

KAPIL

CRM-M-7451-2

3. Vid petitioner w investigation

4. Officer-ASI investigation

5. this Court da without comm 09.02.2026, made absolu of Bharatiya

15.07.2026 Kapil

2026 (O&M) hearing subject to the conditi Section 482(2) of the BNSS ( Cr.P.C.). Adjourned to 22.04.2026.

de order dated 09.02.2026 pa was granted interim bail and n. Learned State counsel, on instru Dhan Prakash submits that n and is not required for any furth Petitioner has joined investigat ated 09.02.2026. In the circum menting on merits, the petition i granting interim anticipatory b ute, subject to the conditions laid Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS (SHAL

Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable

tions as envisaged under (erstwhile Section 438(2)

6. ” assed by this Court, the d was directed to join uctions from Investigating t petitioner has joined her investigation. tion pursuant to order of mstances of the case but is allowed and order dated bail to the petitioner, is d down in Section 482(2) S), 2023. LINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE d : Yes/No : Yes/No

KAPIL