CRM-M/29978/2026 of GULSHAN @ GULSHAN KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on 15 July 2026

1. Sanhita, 2023 bearing CRR a time bound dated 01.10 pending befo

2. dated 01.10. members und case, trial w arguments. dated 21.10.2 but the polic filed a protes on 31.10.20 Kurukshetra before learne 978-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA

Gulshan Kumar VERSUS ryana and others

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Kushagra Beniwal, Advocat Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Har

*** gh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Section 528 3, has been filed to direct the rev R No.6 of 2026 titled ‘Gulshan v d manner, before passing of fina .2014, Police Station City T ore learned Additional Chief Judi Learned counsel for the petiti .2014 was registered against t der Sections 148, 149, 323, 324 was near conclusion and was f Cross version of the case was a 2014 under Sections 148, 149, 3 ce cancelled the case and filed st petition against the cancellati

025. Revision petition against dated 31.10.2025 was filed on ed Additional Sessions Judge, K

F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-29978-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026

Petitioner

Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL te for the petitioner. ryana. 8 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha visional court to decide revision vs. Suresh Kumar and others’ in al judgment in case FIR No.700 Thanesar, District Kurukshetra, icial Magistrate, Kurukshetra. oner submits that FIR No.700 the petitioners and his family 4, 341, 325 and 506 IPC. In that fixed for defence evidence and also registered vide FIR No.744 323, 324, 325, 447 and 506 IPC cancellation report. Petitioner ion report which was dismissed t the order of learned CJM, n 08.01.2025 and was pending Kurukshetra. The prayer in the )

r s

a n n

, y t d

C r d , g e KAPIL 2026.07.16 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-299

petition is fo the criminal r pronounced.

3.

4. of official res was facing t therefore, no

5. and the cros findings. Tria and is fixed that the revis 31.10.2025 o revision peti Ordered acco

6. the revisiona for stay of th

7. 15.07.2026 Kapil 978-2026 (O&M) or a direction to the revisional c revision before the judgment in Further that final judgment in th Notice to the official respondent Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Ha spondents-State. He submits that trial was 12 year old and neede order for staying the trial in the As per settled principles of law ss version have to be decided t al in the FIR No.700 dated 01.10 for defence evidence and argu sional court seized of the revision of learned CJM, Kurukshetra sh ition expeditiously, preferably w ordingly. The petitioner would be entitled al court for early hearing of the p he trial against him before that co The petition stands disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reason Whether Reportable :

court for expeditious disposal of FIR No.700 dated 01.10.2014 is he FIR be stayed. ts only. aryana, accepts notice on behalf t the FIR in which the petitioner ed to be decided expeditiously, FIR may be passed. w, the FIR against the petitioners together to avoid contradictory 0.2014 has reached at final stage uments. It is, therefore, required n petition challening order dated hould be directed to decide the within a period of two months. d to move an application before petition and may press his prayer ourt.

(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE oned :

Yes/No

Yes/No f s f r , s y e d d e . e r

) KAPIL 2026.07.16 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document