Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/26339/2026 of BALDEV RAJ @ BALDEV KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 13 July 2026
AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 208(B) Baldev Raj @ Baldev Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL 1. FIR No.58 dated and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Bahawala, Fazilka. anticipatory bail.
IN THE
208(B)
Baldev Raj @
State of Pun
CORAM: H
Present:
SHALINI SI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. FIR No.58 d and Section 3 Police Statio anticipatory b
2. order was pa E PUNJAB AND HARYANA H CHANDIGARH
CRM- Date
@ Baldev Kumar
V/S njab
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Ms. Shiwani, Advoate for Mr. Rythem Bajaj, Advocate for Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punj
**** INGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks anticipatory ba dated 21.05.2025, under Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to P on Bahawala, Fazilka. This i bail. While issuing notice of motion ssed:- “The present petition has been fi BNSS, 2023 seeking grant of bearing FIR No.58 dated 21. 324(3), 326(a) of BNS, 2023 an of Damage to Public Property Police Station Bahawala, Fazilk
HIGH COURT AT -M-26339-2026 (O&M) of decision: 13.07.2026
…Petitioner
…Respondent LINI SINGH NAGPAL r the petitioner. jab.
ail in case arising out of ns 324(3), 326(a) of BNS Public Property Act, 1984, is the first petition for on 08.05.2026, following filed under Section 482 of anticipatory bail in case .05.2025 under Sections nd section 3 of Prevention Act, 1984) registered at a (Annexure P-1). KAPIL
CRM-M-26339
3. Vid petitioner w investigation -2026 (O&M) Learned counsel for the case of the present petitioner is o of co-accused namely, Anant Ra granted interim bail, vide order by this Court in CRM-M-21269 Notice of motion. In pursuance of advance AAG, Punjab put in appearanc behalf of respondent-State and that the case of the present petiti as that of the co-accused. Heard. Given above, the petition investigation as and when re Officer. In the event of his arre admitted to interim bail on f bonds to the satisfaction of inve subject to the conditions as e 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile till the next date of hearing. Interim order in the same M-21269-2026. To be heard alo 2026, on the date fixed i.e
de order dated 08.05.2026 pa was granted interim bail and n.
petitioner contended that on similar footings as that am, who has already been r dated 20.04.2026 passed -2026. notice, Mr. Anup Singh, ce and accepted notice on d did not dispute the fact ioner is on similar footing ner is directed to join the equired by Investigating est, the petitioner shall be furnishing of bail/surety stigating/arresting Officer envisaged under Section Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.), terms as passed in CRM- ongwith CRM-M-21269- e.13.07.2026.” assed by this Court, the d was directed to join
KAPIL
CRM-M-26339
4. Officer-HC investigation
5. this Court d without comm 08.05.2026, made absolu of Bharatiya
13.07.2026 Kapil
-2026 (O&M) Learned State counsel, on instru Jagmeet Singh submits that n and is not required for any furth Petitioner has joined investigat dated 08.05.2026. In the circu menting on merits, the petition i granting interim anticipatory b ute, subject to the conditions laid Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS (SHAL
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
uctions from Investigating t petitioner has joined her investigation. tion pursuant to order of umstances of the case but is allowed and order dated bail to the petitioner, is d down in Section 482(2) S), 2023. LINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE d : Yes/No : Yes/No
KAPIL