Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8078/2026 of AJAIB SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS on 13 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8078-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 AJAIB SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Jagraj Singh Khiva, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8078-2026
Date of Decision: 13.07.2026
AJAIB SINGH
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Jagraj Singh Khiva, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of order or directions to respondent No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family at the hands of respondent No. 4 as they are harassing and humiliating the petitioner and his entire family and trying to implicate the petitioner in false criminal case of NDPS Act at the instance of respondent No. 5 and 6 because respondent No.6 is facing trial as an accused in case FIR No. 35 dated 05.05.2021 under Section 25 Arms Act, 302,452,506 IPC (Sections 307,34 added lateron) registered at statement of daughter of petitioner at Police Station Rori District Sirsa and respondent No. 5 being powerful political leader and being real brother of respondent No. 6 pressuring respondent No. 4 to send the petitioner in jail RENU RAWAT 2026.07.14 17.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh by hook and crook with a further prayer to to take appropriate action on the representation dated 04.07.2026 moved by the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 04.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.3- Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, District Sirsa but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.3- Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, District Sirsa to look into his representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents No. 1 to 3.
4. At the asking of the Court,Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Superintendent of Police, Sirsa, District Sirsa to consider and decide the representation representation dated 04.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.
(H.S.GREWAL) 13.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.14 17.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh