Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/29229/2026 of ANKUSH Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 215 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29229-2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 ANKUSH ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-29229-2026

Date of decision: 13.07.2026

ANKUSH

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for

Mr. Dushyant Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

****

H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (erstwhile Section 438 Cr.P.C.) in FIR No. 164 dated 25.03.2025 under Sections 115,118(1), 190,191(3), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal, Haryana.

2. This Court, vide order dated 21.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.).

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation.

4. Status report by way of an affidavit of Gorakh Pal, HPS, Dy. Superintendent of Police. Assandh, Karnal has been filed in the Court today RENU RAWAT 2026.07.14 09.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh and the same is taken on record. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further custodial interrogation.

5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 21.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

6. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioners from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 13.07.2026 (H.S.GREWAL) renu

JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.14 09.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead