Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRM-M/37290/2026 of ARUN KOHLI Vs UT OF CHANDIGARH THROUGH SSP AND ORS on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37290-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 ARUN KOHLI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH THROUGH SSP AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. B.B.Bagga, Advocate for the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-37290-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 13.07.2026

ARUN KOHLI

... PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH THROUGH SSP AND OTHERS

... RESPONDENTS

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:-

Mr. B.B.Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner.

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (482 Cr.P.C.) seeking appropriate orders or directions to respondent no.1 for conducting fair investigation of the complaint of the petitioner dated 10.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) and for assessing accountability of all the officers concerned in Police Station Sector 19-D Chandigarh, who blatantly resorted to abuse of their official position solely to terrorise, harass, humiliate, mentally torture and pressurize the petitioner, at the behest of respondent No. 3, for coercing the petitioners to desist from taking any legal action against respondent No. 3.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute is purely civil and does not involve any cognizable criminal offence and is outside the jurisdiction of the Police.

3. Notice of motion.

4. Mr. Samir Rathaur, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of the State and does not dispute the fact that the matter is purely JANKI BHATT 2026.07.14 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh civil in nature and further submits that in case, the petitioner is required for any investigation, a three days prior notice shall be served upon him.

5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition stands disposed of with a direction to the official respondents that, in case the petitioner is required for any investigation on any application moved by the private respondent, a three days prior notice shall be served upon him in accordance with law.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(H.S.GREWAL) 13.07.2026

JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.07.14 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead