Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/37227/2026 of RAMOTAR @ RAMAVTAR SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 13 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 CRM-M-37227-2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 RAMOTAR @ RAMAVTAR SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Rao Ajender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
103
CRM-M-37227-2026
Date of Decision: 13.07.2026
RAMOTAR @ RAMAVTAR SINGH
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Mr. Rao Ajender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS (Section 438 Cr.P.C) for grant of pre-arrest / anticipatory bail to the petitioner against order dated 24.04.2025 whereby non-bailable warrants had been issued against him in FIR No. 09 dated 14.01.2023 under Sections 148,149,323,324,325,447,427 of IPC (Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 329(3), 324 (4) of BNS) registered at Police Station Kosli, District Rewari.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court on 24.04.2025 as he had to return to Saudi Arabia in connection with his employment. It is further submitted that the petitioner had duly informed his counsel of his inability to attend the proceedings and had requested him to move an application seeking exemption from personal appearance. However, when the case was taken up, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the learned trial Court cancelled the bail granted to the petitioner, ordered forfeiture of his bail bonds RENU RAWAT 2026.07.14 17.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh and surety bonds, and issued non-bailable warrants of arrest against him. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to surrender before the learned trial Court and undertakes to appear on each and every date of hearing, unless exempted in accordance with law. He, therefore, prays that the impugned order be set aside and the petitioner be permitted to surrender before the learned trial Court and participate in the trial proceedings regularly.
3. Notice of motion.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
5. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the case file.
6. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 24.04.2025 passed by the learned SDJM, Kosli. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the ld. Court below within 07 days from today and appears at 10:00 A.M, his application for grant of regular bail shall be considered and disposed of by the ld.Court below within a period of three days.
7. The petition stands disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 13.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.14 17.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh