Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8093/2026 of SAPNA RANI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS on 10 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8093-2026 Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 SAPNA RANI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8093-2026
Date of Decision: 10.07.2026
SAPNA RANI
.....PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:
Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for
Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Criminal Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the respondent no. 2 to take appropriate legal action against the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 who, in connivance with the respondent Nos. 6 to 10, illegally detained the husband of the petitioner from his house and took him to the Police Station and detained him in the police station and committed third degree torture and inflicted various injuries on various parts of the body of the husband of the petitioner and for grant of necessary compensation on account of illegal detention and torture and harassment committed by the police officials on the person of the husband of the petitioner namely Manjit Singh and abused him and threatened him with dire consequences. RENU RAWAT 2026.07.10 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 30.06.2026 ( Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, , Punjab but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, , Punjab to look into his representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents.
4. At the asking of the Court, Mr.P.S.Pandher, Asst. A.G.Punjab accepts notice on behalf of official respondents.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, Punjab to consider and decide the representation dated 30.06.2026 ( Annexure P-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order.
(H.S.GREWAL) 10.07.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.10 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh