Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/13753/2025 of SHOKAT ALI Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 10 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR YANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRWP-13753-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2026 SHOKAT ALI PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mohd. Jameel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR YANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-13753-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision: 10.07.2026
SHOKAT ALI
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
Mohd. Jameel, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG Punjab.
***
Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 226 of the Constitution of India has been invoked for issuing a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for appointment of a Warrant Officer for the release of the detenue, namely, Suhalia d/o petitioner, stated to be in illegal confinement of respondents No.4 and 5.
2. Vide order dated 19.12.2025, this Court directed respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Malerkotla to ensure presence of detenue before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malerkotla for recording of her statement. It was further ordered that in case, she (detenue) was illegally detained by respondents No.4 and 5 and she expressed her willingness to go with the petitioner, she may be permitted to do so.
3. Report of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malerkotla has been received. As per report, alleged detenue appeared before the Court and stated that she wants to live with her husband-Shiv Kumar. She further stated that she was threatened by her parental family and she did not want to go with petitioner-Shokat Ali. HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.13 15:15 I agree to specified portions of this document
CRWP-13753-2025 (O&M)
4. In view of the report submitted by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malerkotla, it does not appear to be a case of illegal detention. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.
5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 10.07.2026 HS.CHAUHAN Whether Speaking/Reasoned :
Yes/No Whether Reportable :
Yes/No
HARPREET SINGH CHAUHAN 2026.07.13 15:15 I agree to specified portions of this document