Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/8109/2026 of POOJA DEVI AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 10 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8109-2026 Date of Decision:-10.07.2026 POOJA DEVI AND ANR ....Petitioners. Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Karandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. VIKRAM
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8109-2026 Date of Decision:-10.07.2026 POOJA DEVI AND ANR ....Petitioners. Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. .....Respondents.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Karandeep Singh, Advocate
for the petitioners.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J
. (ORAL)
This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and not to harass and implicate the petitioners in any false criminal case and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 27.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are in a live-in-relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copy PRIYANKA 2026.07.10 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8109-2026 -2- of 'Aadhaar' card and affidavit (Annexures P-1 and P-2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been placed on record.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents.
5. Heard.
6. Without commenting on the validity of the relationship, and further keeping in view the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Yash Pal and another versus State of Haryana and others (CRWP No. 4660 of 2021, decided on 09.09.2024), the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 27.06.2026 (Annexure P-3) and take requisite action, if so warranted, as per the facts and circumstances of the matter, in accord- ance with law.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 10, 2026
JUDGE pry
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No PRIYANKA 2026.07.10 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document