Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/33001/2026 of VINAY SAINI Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 10 July 2026
1 203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33001-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 VINAY SAINI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-33001-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 10.07.2026
VINAY SAINI
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
... RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL
Present:-
Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG Haryana.
H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 84 dated 07.04.2026, registered under sections 115(2) BNS/323 IPC, 117(2) BNS/325 IPC, 3(5) BNS/34 IPC, 351(2) BNS/506 IPC (Section 333 BNS/452 IPC added later on) at Police Station Sector-50, Gurugram.
2. The Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 08.06.2026, had directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation and the petitioner shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioner was also ordered to abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482(2) BNSS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 08.06.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined JANKI BHATT 2026.07.10 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh and cooperated with the investigation agency.
4. Learned State counsel has filed the status report by way of affidavit of Amit Bhatia, Assistant Commissioner of Police, East, Gurugram, Haryana in the Court today and the same is taken on record. He submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation.
5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 08.06.2026 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
6. However, it is clarified that the investigating authority on addition of an offence or offences may not proceed to arrest the accused/petitioner, but for arresting the accused/petitioner on such addition of offence or offences it needs to obtain an order to arrest the accused/petitioner from the Court which had granted the bail in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sumit Vs State of U.P. and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 830 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026.
7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(H.S.GREWAL) 10.07.2026
JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2026.07.10 17:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh