Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/5498/2026 of JASPREET BAGGA & ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UNION TERRITORY AND OTHERS on 9 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.5498 of 2026 Date of Decision:-09.07.2026 Jaspreet Bagga and another …..Petitioners. Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Rishita Neev,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.5498 of 2026 Date of Decision:-09.07.2026
Jaspreet Bagga and another …..Petitioners. Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Rishita Neev, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Addl. P.P, UT, Chandigarh.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the instant writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to decide the representation dated 13.03.2026 and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that FIR No.0081 dated 13.05.2026 under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been registered at Police Station Sector-39, Chandigarh, and accused Anurag Khullar stands arrested.
3. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that YAG DUTT 2026.07.10 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRWP No.5498 of 2026 -2-
the petitioners do not wish to pursue the present petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the same.
4. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 09, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.10 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.