Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/33897/2026 of MANPREET SINGH ALIAS MANU Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 9 July 2026
Petitioner Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the bail application. However, learned counsel has not been able to deny that the case of the petitioners is at par with that of co-accused Sona Singh @ Sonu and Jatinder Singh. 6. I have considered the submissions made by
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
…..Petitioner
r
Chandigarh
Per contra, learned State counsel has opposed the bail application. However, learned counsel has not been able to deny that the case
Chandigarh
of the petitioners is at par with that of co-accused Sona Singh @ Sonu and Jatinder Singh.
6. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.
7. No recovery was made from the petitioners and they were nominated on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused. The petitioners namely Manpreet Singh @ Manu and Bittu Singh are in custody since 17.06.2025 and 10.10.2025. Final report has been submitted and the trial will take a sufficiently long time to conclude and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody any longer. Co-accused namely Sona Singh @ Sonu and Jatinder Singh have already released on regular bail.
8. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petitions are allowed. The petitioners are ordered to be released on regular bail on their furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.
Rekha
Chandigarh