CRM-M/36588/2026 of HARDESH KAUR GILL Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 9 July 2026

1. directing off dated 07.11. accordance w

2. a Non-Resid passed away brother, Naib favour, to en Singh Gill a petitioner cam of attorney, private respo regard but no

3.

4. accepts notic 588-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA

aur Gill

VERSUS njab and others

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAL Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocat Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Pu

*** gh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Section 52 ficial respondents to conduct f 2025 and to take legal action with law. Learned counsel for the petition dent Indian (NRI) residing in y during COVID-19 pandemic b Singh Gill, petitioner execut nable him to manage her prope also passed away on 14.03.202 me to know in October 2025 tha her ancestral property had bee ondents. Complaint was made o action was taken. Notice of motion to official resp Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, P ce on behalf of the official respo

F PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CRM-M-36588-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026

Petitioner

Respondents LINI SINGH NAGPAL te for the petitioner. unjab. 8 of BNSS has been filed for fair investigation in complaint against private respondents, in ner submits that the petitioner is Australia. Petitioner's mother c in Moga. On request of her ted a power of attorney in his erty affairs. Subsequently, Naib

25. It is further submitted that at on the basis of the said power en transferred in favour of the to official respondents in this pondents. Punjab, who is present in Court, ondents. He on instructions from )

r s

r t n s r r s b t r e s , m KAPIL 2026.07.10 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-365

ASI Jaspal S respondents that the dispu

5. U.P. and ot Hemant Yas the High Cou first informa High Courts be able to d Therefore, th the Magistrat Magistrate w information r he can also m

6. petitioner's r the present p alternative re

7. 09.07.2026 Kapil 588-2026 (O&M) Singh, submits that petitioner’s was received and was consigne ute was civil in nature. Hon'ble Supreme Court of Ind thers, (2008) 2 SCC 409, and hwant Dhage and others, (2016 urts are flooded with writ petition ation report or praying for prop entertain such writ petitions, th do any other work except dea he complainant must avail of hi te concerned under Section 156( will ensure, if prima facie he is s report and also ensure a proper monitor the investigation. Since the competent authorit epresentation and concluded tha petition is disposed of with lib emedies available to her, in accor Pending applications, if any, stan Whether Speaking/Reason Whether Reportable :

s representation against private ed on 04.06.2026 on the ground dia in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v.

6) 6 SCC 277, has observed that ns praying for registration of the per investigation and that if the hey will be flooded and may not aling with such writ petitions. is alternate remedy to approach

(3) Cr.P.C and if he does so, the satisfied, registration of the first investigation in the matter, and ty has already examined the at the dispute is civil in nature, berty to the petitioner to avail rdance with law.

nd disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE oned :

Yes/No

Yes/No e d f

t e e t . h e t d e , l

) KAPIL 2026.07.10 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document