Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRWP/7961/2026 of GURPRMESHAR SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 8 July 2026
of 2026 (O&M) -2- before this Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one. Private respondents were now threatening to lodge a criminal case against the petitioners by using their influence. A representation Annexure P- 6 was moved to SSP Bathinda, to ensure
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
REEMA SAINI 2026.07.09 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRWP No.7961 of 2026 (O&M) -2- before this Court, which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one. Private respondents were now threatening to lodge a criminal case against the petitioners by using their influence. A representation Annexure P- 6 was moved to SSP Bathinda, to ensure protection of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents but no action was taken.
3. Notice of motion to official respondents only.
4. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and on instructions from ASI Sukhjant Singh submits that the matter in dispute was of civil nature and petitioner’s representation though received by officials respondents, did not warrant any action as it was based on mere apprehension.
5. The dispute between the petitioner and private respondents, who are co-sharers in joint holding is civil in nature relating to partition of joint land. The petition is based on mere apprehension of the petitioner, without disclosing any particular incident and without specifying time and date of the alleged threats. In case any complaint is moved by the private respondents to the police disclosing cognizable offences, the police would be statutorily bound to register FIR.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court does not perceive any threat to life and liberty to petitioner. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL)
JUDGE 08.07.2026 reema Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No REEMA SAINI 2026.07.09 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh