Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/33470/2026 of PAPPU KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA on 6 July 2026
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 228 Pappu Kumar State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition preferred under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN T
Pappu Kumar
State of Harya
CORAM : H Present: M
M
** VIKRAM AG
Pr Bharatiya Nag grant of regul registered und Sanrakshan an District Kuruk
2. C is taken on rec
3. O vehicle was ap purpose of sm The driver, how the owner of th
4. Le been falsely im since 25.12.20 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR
CRM-M
Date of D
V/s ana
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKR Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate, for th Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. ** GGARWAL, J (ORAL) rayer in the present petition p garik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (fo ar bail to the petitioner in case der Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 1 nd Gausamverdhan Act, 2015 a kshetra. ustody certificate filed by learn cord. On a complaint submitted by one pprehended which was stated t muggling. Two cows and one b wever, fled and was produced on he vehicle and is in custody sinc earned counsel for the petitioner mplicated. He further states th 025; no recovery is to be made fr JAB AND HARYANA RH M-33470-2026 Decision: 06.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondent RAM AGGARWAL he petitioner. DAG, Haryana. preferred under Section 483 of for short the “BNSS”) is for the FIR No.403, dated 24.12.2025 13(3) of the Haryana Gauvansh at Police Station Sadar Pehowa, ed State counsel in Court today e Nikhil Bajaj, on 24.12.2025, a to be loaded with cattle for the bull were found in the vehicle. n the next day on 25.12.2025 by e then. r submits that the petitioner has hat the petitioner is in custody om him and the final report has
f e h , y a e . y s y VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.06 18.17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-33470-2026
been submitted. He further submits that under the circumstances, the trial is not likely to conclude in the near future.
5. Per contra, learned counsel representing the State of Haryana has opposed the bail petition.
6. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.
7. The petitioner is in custody for the last more than 6 months and 08 days. No recovery is to be made from the petitioner. The trial will take a sufficiently long time to conclude. In the considered opinion of this Court, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody any longer who is already in custody for the last more than 6 months and is not known to be a previous offender.
8. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE July 06, 2026 vcgarg
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.06 18.17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document