Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/7316/2026 of RAHUL Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 2 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRWP-7316-2026 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 Rahul …Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Kapish Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Sahni,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-7316-2026

Date of Decision: 02.07.2026

Rahul

…Petitioner

V/s State of Haryana and others

…Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Kapish Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to trace, recover and produce detenue (daughter of respondent No.4) before this Court.

2. Status report by way of affidavit of Sh. Malkeet Singh, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rai, District Sonipat filed in Court today is taken on record. As per the same, the statement of the alleged detenue was recorded as per which, she stated that she is happily residing with her father and her husband after having solemnized marriage. The statement has been placed on record as Annexure R-1. The combined statement of the father, mother and maternal uncle of the alleged detenue has also been recorded, which has been placed on record as Annexure R-2 wherein, it has been stated that their daughter is residing with the family and her husband voluntarily and has not been illegally confined or detained by anyone.

VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.02 17.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-7316-2026

3. Learned State counsel also submits that he has specific instructions from SI Nasim Jakhal, P.S. Kundli, who is present in Court, to state that there is no threat to the life and liberty of the alleged detenue.

4. That being so, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. The petition is accordingly disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)

JUDGE July 02, 2026 vcgarg

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable

: Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.02 17.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead