Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/32235/2026 of RAJESH JAIN ALIAS DR. R.K. JAIN Vs SANDEEP MEHRA AND OTHERS on 1 July 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.32235 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-01.07.2026 Rajesh Jain @ Dr. R.K. Jain …..Petitioner. Versus Sandeep Mehra and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Petitioner in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
115
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.32235 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-01.07.2026
Rajesh Jain @ Dr. R.K. Jain …..Petitioner. Versus Sandeep Mehra and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Petitioner in person.
Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. A.G, Haryana.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
The petitioner, who appears in person, states that he has a reasonable apprehension that he will not get justice in the Court where his criminal cases are pending. He, however, gives up his claim as regards transfer of the execution petition. He states that he will avail remedies as shall be admissible in law as regards the same.
2. I have considered the submissions made by the petitioner and have gone through the order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jind. Though this Court does not find any illegality in the same and does not find the apprehensions expressed by the petitioner to be true and finds them to be mere apprehensions, keeping in view the fact that justice should not only be done, it also seen to be have been done, the cases referred to by the petitioner, i.e. (1) COMI-91-2024 titled “R.K. Jain YAG DUTT 2026.07.01 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRM-M No.32235 of 2026 (O&M) -2-
Versus Rambir Khatkar; (2) CRM-89-2024 titled “R.K. Jain Versus Rambir Khatkar and (3) CHI-502-2019 titled “State Versus R.K. Jain”, be transferred to a Court of competent jurisdiction.
3. The instant petition is accordingly disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 01, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.01 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.