Punjab and Haryana High Court
RSA/110/2025 of PARVEEN KUMARI ALIAS PARVEEN GUPTA Vs RAJ RANI on 29 May 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.110 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-29.05.2026 Parveen Kumari @ Parveen Gupta …..Appellant. Versus Raj Rani .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.110 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-29.05.2026
Parveen Kumari @ Parveen Gupta …..Appellant. Versus Raj Rani .....Respondent.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present:- Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate
for the appellant.
Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate and
Mr. Amrit Paul Nahar, Advocate
for the respondent.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Parties are present. Fresh compromise deed dated 29.05.2026 filed in Court today is taken on record. A bank draft dated 27.05.2026 of Rs.7,00,000/- drawn on Indian Bank (photocopy of which has been retained on the file) has been handed over to the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the compromise deed dated 29.05.2026.
3. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise deed dated 29.05.2026. Decree-sheet be prepared accordingly making the compromise deed a part of the said decree.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) May 29, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.05.29 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.