Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
JAMMU AND KASHMIR DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED vs ALVY ORIENTALS on 12 June 2026
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
BEFORE: A S NARANG, PRESIDING OFFICER
TA No: 135/2023
Date of Institution: 19.02.2022
Date of Decision: 12.06.2026
Jammu and Kashmir Development Finance Corporation Limited at Ground Floor, Jawahar Lal Nehra Udyog Bhawan, Jammu and Corporate Office at Ground Floor, Sanat Ghar Bemina, Srinagar.
……..Applicant
Vs.
1. Alvy Orientals Ichgam, Budgam Kashmir
2. Showkat Hussain Rather s/o Late Ghulam Rasool Rather, r/o Ichgam Budgam, Kashmir.
……….Defendants
Advocates
Sh. Abhijeet Taneja proxy counsel for Sh. Agam Bansal, Counsel for the applicant Corporation.
Ms. Riya Mailk proxy counsel for Sh. Abdul Sattar, Counsel for the Defendants.
TA for the Recovery of ₹36,19,144/- with interest @10.90% per annum with monthly rests from 19.02.2022.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. On 19.02.2022, Jammu and Kashmir Development Finance Corporation Limited, filed the suit for the recovery of ₹36,19,144/- with interest against Alvy Orientals Ichgam and another (defendants) in the Court of Principal District Judge, Srinagar. However, vide order dated 18.01.2023, this suit was transferred by the Court of Additional District Judge, (Bank Cases), Srinagar, to DRT-I, Chandigarh.
2. Corporation’s case is that on 28.05.2018, it had granted a loan of ₹27.00 Lacs to defendant No.1 through its proprietor defendant No.2 in the form of Term Loan under CGTMSE Scheme for business purpose. To secure the loan, Defendant No.1 had mortgaged his land and hypothecated assets (fully detailed in para Nos.3 and 4 of the application). The loan was chargeable to interest @10.90% per annum with monthly rests. Defendant No.2 stood as guarantor. On 30.09.2021, a sum of ₹36,19,144/- was due from the defendants. Despite repeated requests, defendants did not make the repayment. Hence, the suit.
3. The Civil Court sent summons to the defendants by registered post, which was duly served. After transfer, Defendants summonses were sent to the defendants. On 06.03.2025, the Defendants did not put in appearance and failed to avail the opportunity of admission and denial of the documents.
4. In order to prove its case, the Corporation has placed on record the affidavit of Mr. Gowhar Arif, General Manager, along with the original loan and security documents.
5. I have perused the evidence on the record. I am of the considered view that the Corporation has proved its case that it had advanced the loan of ₹27.00 Lacs and on 30.09.2021, a sum of ₹36,19,144/- was due.
6. Accordingly, the case of the Corporation for the recovery of ₹36,19,144/- (Rupees Thirty Six Lacs Nineteen Thousand One Hundred Forty Four Only) with interest @10.90% per annum with monthly rests from 19.02.2022, till the date of payment is hereby allowed with costs. The liability of both the defendants would be joint and several. Corporation can recover its dues by the sale of mortgaged land fully detailed in para No.3 of the application as well as from the personal movable and immovable property(ies) of the defendants.
7. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of.
8. Recovery Certificate be issued accordingly.
9. Parties are directed to appear before Recovery Officer on 14.07.2026, who is directed to distribute the sale proceeds of the
mortgage land and hypothecated assets as per the provisions of Section 19(20-AB) of the Act.
10. A Copy of this order along with Recovery Certificate be sent to the Recovery Officer as well as the parties.
Pronounced in the open court.
(A S Narang) Dated: 12.06.2026 Presiding Officer DRT-1, Chandigarh MANOJ KALRA