Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED vs M/S NOORANI GARMENTS on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH

BEFORE: A S NARANG, PRESIDING OFFICER

TA No: 149/2023

Date of Institution: 17.10.2020

Date of Decision: 13.07.2026

Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. B/u Zoonimar, Srinagar.

...Applicant

Vs.

1. M/s Noorani Garments, Sangeen Darwaza, Hawal, Srinagar, through defendant No 2.

2. Ghulam Mohi-ud-din-Bhat

S/o Abdul Ahad Bhat

R/o Sangeen Darwaza, Srinagar.

(BORROWER)

3. Mohammad Rafiq Bhat

S/o Late Abdul Aziz Bhat

R/o Goni-Khan, Amirakadal, Srinagar.

4. Ghulam Jeelani Neeka

S/o Ali Mohammad Neeka

R/o Aquilmir Khanyar, Srinagar.

5. Abdul Rashid Pandaw

S/o Abdul Rehman Pandaw

R/o Buchwara, Dalgate, Srinagar.

6. Abdul Rehman Sheikh

S/o Late Mohammad Subhan Sheikh

R/o Khanyar, Srinagar.

(GUARANTORS)

...Defendants

Advocates

Sh. PS Sobti, Counsel for the applicant bank.

Defendants – ex parte.

TA for the Recovery of Rs.25,65,210.58/- with interest @13.50% per annum with monthly rests from 17.10.2020.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. On 17.10.2020, Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. filed the suit for the recovery of Rs.25,65,210.58/- with interest against M/s Noorani Garments and others (defendants) in the Court of the Principal District Judge, Srinagar. However, vide order dated 07.12.2022, this suit was transferred by the Court of the Additional District Judge (Bank Cases), Srinagar, to DRT-I, Chandigarh.

2. Bank’s case is that on 31.05.2008, it had granted a Cash Credit facility of Rs.4.00 lacs to defendant No.1, through its proprietor for business purpose. To secure the loan, defendant No.1, through its proprietor had hypothecated its assets (fully detailed in Para No.4 of the plaint). Defendant Nos.3 and 4 stood as Guarantors for the above Cash Credit facility (Guarantee Deed attached to the plaint as Annexure P-10). The Cash Credit facility was chargeable to interest @13.50% per annum with monthly rests. On 07.09.2012, Bank had granted a Consumption Loan facility of Rs.3.70 lacs to defendant No.2. Defendant Nos.4 to 6 stood as Guarantors for the above Consumption Loan facility (Guarantee Deed attached to the plaint as Annexure P-16). On 01.07.2020, a sum of Rs.25,65,210.58/- was due from the defendants. Despite repeated requests, defendants did not make the repayment. Hence, this suit.

3. On 21.11.2023, summonses were sent to the defendants by registered post, which were duly served. However, defendants did not put in appearance. Vide order dated 18.09.2024, they were proceeded ex parte.

4. In order to prove its case, the Bank has placed on record the affidavit of Mr. Jaweed Ahmad Shara, Executive Law, along with the loan and original security documents.

5. I have perused the evidence on the record. I am of the considered view that the Bank has proved its case that it had advanced the Cash Credit facility of Rs.4.00 lacs to defendant No.1, through its proprietor and a Consumption Loan facility of Rs.3.70 lacs to defendant No.2 and on 01.07.2020, a sum of Rs.25,65,210.58/- was due.

6. Accordingly, the application of the Bank for the recovery of Rs.25,65,210.58/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Lacs Sixty-Five Thousand Two Hundred Ten and Paise Fifty-Eight Only) with interest @13.50% per annum with monthly rests from 17.10.2020, till the date of payment is hereby allowed with costs. The liability of defendant Nos.1 to 4 would be joint and several for the amount due in the C.C. Limit. The liability of Defendant Nos.2, 4 to 6 would be joint and several for the amount due in Consumption Loan Facility. Bank can recover its dues by the sale of hypothecated assets (fully detailed in Para No.4 of the plaint), as well as from the personal movable and immovable property(ies) of the defendants.

7. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of.

8. Recovery Certificate be issued accordingly.

9. Parties are directed to appear before Recovery Officer on 13.08.2026, who is directed to distribute the sale proceeds of the mortgaged property as per the provisions of Section 19(20-AB) of the Act.

10. A Copy of this order along with Recovery Certificate be sent to the Recovery Officer as well as the parties.

Pronounced in the open court.

(A S Narang) Dated: 13.07.2026 Presiding Officer DRT-1, Chandigarh HARSH

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead